|
|
Registro completo
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA La Estanzuela. |
Fecha : |
26/12/2018 |
Actualizado : |
26/12/2018 |
Tipo de producción científica : |
Poster |
Autor : |
CONDON, F.; BERRETTA, A.; QUINCKE, M.; GERMAN, S.; GONZÁLEZ, S.N. |
Afiliación : |
FEDERICO CONDON PRIANO, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; ANA BERRETTA, Curadora Banco de Germoplasma, Investigadora retirada de INIA.; MARTIN CONRADO QUINCKE WALDEN, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; SILVIA ELISA GERMAN FAEDO, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; SILVANA NOEMI GONZALEZ PARODI, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay. |
Título : |
Colección de recursos genéticos de trigo en el banco de germoplasma de INIA La Estanzuela. [Poster]. |
Fecha de publicación : |
2018 |
Fuente / Imprenta : |
In: German, S.; Quincke, M.; Vázquez, D.; Castro, M.; Pereyra, S.; Silva, P.; García, A. (Eds.). Seminario Internacional "1914-2014: Un siglo de mejoramiento de trigo en La Estanzuela". Montevideo (UY): INIA, 2018. |
Páginas : |
p. 68. |
Serie : |
(INIA Serie Técnica; 241). |
ISBN : |
978-9974-38-406-4 |
ISSN : |
1688-9266 |
Idioma : |
Español |
Palabras claves : |
BANCO GERMOPLASMA; MEJORAMIENTO DE TRIGO. |
Thesagro : |
TRIGO. |
Asunto categoría : |
F30 Genética vegetal y fitomejoramiento |
URL : |
http://www.ainfo.inia.uy/digital/bitstream/item/12215/1/st-241-2018.p.68-Condon-et-al.pdf
|
Marc : |
LEADER 00860nam a2200229 a 4500 001 1059384 005 2018-12-26 008 2018 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 020 $a978-9974-38-406-4 022 $a1688-9266 100 1 $aCONDON, F. 245 $aColección de recursos genéticos de trigo en el banco de germoplasma de INIA La Estanzuela. [Poster].$h[electronic resource] 260 $aIn: German, S.; Quincke, M.; Vázquez, D.; Castro, M.; Pereyra, S.; Silva, P.; García, A. (Eds.). Seminario Internacional "1914-2014: Un siglo de mejoramiento de trigo en La Estanzuela". Montevideo (UY): INIA$c2018 300 $ap. 68. 490 $a(INIA Serie Técnica; 241). 650 $aTRIGO 653 $aBANCO GERMOPLASMA 653 $aMEJORAMIENTO DE TRIGO 700 1 $aBERRETTA, A. 700 1 $aQUINCKE, M. 700 1 $aGERMAN, S. 700 1 $aGONZÁLEZ, S.N.
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
Registro original : |
INIA La Estanzuela (LE) |
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
|
| Acceso al texto completo restringido a Biblioteca INIA Tacuarembó. Por información adicional contacte bibliotb@tb.inia.org.uy. |
Registro completo
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Tacuarembó. |
Fecha actual : |
16/10/2014 |
Actualizado : |
20/09/2019 |
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
Circulación / Nivel : |
Internacional - -- |
Autor : |
CUBBAGE, F.; BALMELLI, G.; BUSSONI, A.; NOELLEMEYER, E.; PACHAS, A.N.; FASSOLA, H.; COLCOMBET, L.; ROSSNER, B.; FREY, G.; DUBE, F.; LOPES DE SILVA, M.; STEVENSON, H.; HAMILTON, J.; HUBBARD, W. |
Afiliación : |
FREDERICK CUBBAGE; GUSTAVO DANIEL BALMELLI HERNANDEZ, Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria (INIA), Uruguay; ADRIANA BUSSONI; ELKE NOELLEMEYER; ANIBAL N. PACHAS; HUGO FASSOLA; LUIS COLCOMBET; BELÉN ROSSNER; GREGORY FREY; FRANCIS DUBE; MARCIO LOPES DE SILVA; HAYLEY STEVENSON; JAMES HAMILTON; WILLIAM HUBBARD. |
Título : |
Comparing silvopastoral systems and prospects in eight regions of the world. |
Fecha de publicación : |
2012 |
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Agroforest Systems, 2012, v. 86, p. 303-314 |
DOI : |
10.1007/s10457-012-9482-z |
Idioma : |
Inglés |
Notas : |
History article: Received: 20 October 2011; Accepted: 6 January 2012; Published online: 5 February 2012. |
Contenido : |
Silvopasture systems combine trees, forage, and livestock in a variety of different species and management regimes, depending on the biophysical, economic, cultural, and market factors in a region. We describe and compare actual farm practices and current research trials of silvopastoral systems in eight regions within seven countries of the world: Misiones and Corrientes provinces, Argentina; La Pampa province, Argentina; northwestern Minas Gerais, Brazil; the Ayse´n region of Patagonia, Chile; the North Island of New Zealand; the Southeast United States; Paraguay; and Uruguay. Some countries use native trees and existing forests; some use plantations, particularly of exotic species. Natural forest silvopasture systems generally add livestock in extensive systems, to capture the benefits of shade, forage, and income
diversification without much added inputs. Plantation forest systems are more purposive and intensive, with more focus on joint production and profits, for small
owners, large ranches, and timber companies. Trends suggest that more active management of both natural and planted silvopastoral systems will be required to
enhance joint production of timber and livestock, achieve income diversification and reduce financial risk, makemore profit, improve environmental benefits,
and realize more resilience to adapt to climate change. |
Palabras claves : |
ADOPTION; NEW ZEALAND; SILVOPASTORAL SYSTEMS; SILVOPASTURE; SOUTH AMERICA; USA. |
Thesagro : |
SILVOPASTOREO. |
Asunto categoría : |
A50 Investigación agraria |
Marc : |
LEADER 02447naa a2200385 a 4500 001 1051153 005 2019-09-20 008 2012 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 024 7 $a10.1007/s10457-012-9482-z$2DOI 100 1 $aCUBBAGE, F. 245 $aComparing silvopastoral systems and prospects in eight regions of the world. 260 $c2012 500 $aHistory article: Received: 20 October 2011; Accepted: 6 January 2012; Published online: 5 February 2012. 520 $aSilvopasture systems combine trees, forage, and livestock in a variety of different species and management regimes, depending on the biophysical, economic, cultural, and market factors in a region. We describe and compare actual farm practices and current research trials of silvopastoral systems in eight regions within seven countries of the world: Misiones and Corrientes provinces, Argentina; La Pampa province, Argentina; northwestern Minas Gerais, Brazil; the Ayse´n region of Patagonia, Chile; the North Island of New Zealand; the Southeast United States; Paraguay; and Uruguay. Some countries use native trees and existing forests; some use plantations, particularly of exotic species. Natural forest silvopasture systems generally add livestock in extensive systems, to capture the benefits of shade, forage, and income diversification without much added inputs. Plantation forest systems are more purposive and intensive, with more focus on joint production and profits, for small owners, large ranches, and timber companies. Trends suggest that more active management of both natural and planted silvopastoral systems will be required to enhance joint production of timber and livestock, achieve income diversification and reduce financial risk, makemore profit, improve environmental benefits, and realize more resilience to adapt to climate change. 650 $aSILVOPASTOREO 653 $aADOPTION 653 $aNEW ZEALAND 653 $aSILVOPASTORAL SYSTEMS 653 $aSILVOPASTURE 653 $aSOUTH AMERICA 653 $aUSA 700 1 $aBALMELLI, G. 700 1 $aBUSSONI, A. 700 1 $aNOELLEMEYER, E. 700 1 $aPACHAS, A.N. 700 1 $aFASSOLA, H. 700 1 $aCOLCOMBET, L. 700 1 $aROSSNER, B. 700 1 $aFREY, G. 700 1 $aDUBE, F. 700 1 $aLOPES DE SILVA, M. 700 1 $aSTEVENSON, H. 700 1 $aHAMILTON, J. 700 1 $aHUBBARD, W. 773 $tAgroforest Systems, 2012$gv. 86, p. 303-314
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
Registro original : |
INIA Tacuarembó (TBO) |
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|